More guns won't solve campus shootings
DI Editorial Board
Issue date: 2/22/08 Section: Opinions
In the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings in April 2007, universities nationwide began re-evaluating safety procedures at their campuses. In October 2007, the state Board of Regents approved arming campus police officers at each of the state's public universities. Though the measure was controversial, its goal to increase campus safety, including here at the UI, was the correct one. On Feb. 14, however, a gunman opened fire at Northern Illinois University, killing five students and wounding at least a dozen more before turning the gun on himself. The tragedy has left some demanding that college students be allowed to carry concealed weapons on campus. This Editorial Board could not be more vocal in its opposition to such a proposal.
The UI is no stranger to on-campus violence. On Nov. 1, 1991, a gunman murdered five people on the UI campus and seriously wounded a sixth before taking his own life. Regardless of the amount of protection universities offer on their campuses, security will unfortunately never be absolute. Still, we must rely on a speedy response by university and local authorities when disaster strikes. Their extensive training and expertise is favored over that of terrified - though armed - students inside a classroom. A Wild West-style shootout could endanger more lives than it hopes to save; we cannot afford to even consider this suggestion.
Students for Concealed Carry on Campus describes itself as a national, nonprofit group that supports concealed-handgun permits on university campuses. Formed after the Virginia Tech massacre, the group has no campus leader at the UI. Scott Lewis, the group's media coordinator, says the organization's goal is to take the "advantage away from dangerous individuals with no regard for the law." Arming campus police officers is a positive step forward, Lewis says, but still not enough. We, however, feel that it's the most logical response thus far.
The UI has not taken past instances of campus violence lightly. The Hawk Alert system, introduced last year, can contact students within minutes of a threat on campus. This, combined with the reassurance that university - as well as Iowa City - police are prepared for a rapid response, is far more comforting than potentially armed students. The fear of a faceless, lurking gunman is intensified when tragedies such as the Northern Illinois shooting occur. The response, however, must be a rational one. Armed students will not diminish those fears; in fact, that anxiety may be amplified. Putting more deadly weapons in peoples' hands will never be a sensible response to violence.
The UI is no stranger to on-campus violence. On Nov. 1, 1991, a gunman murdered five people on the UI campus and seriously wounded a sixth before taking his own life. Regardless of the amount of protection universities offer on their campuses, security will unfortunately never be absolute. Still, we must rely on a speedy response by university and local authorities when disaster strikes. Their extensive training and expertise is favored over that of terrified - though armed - students inside a classroom. A Wild West-style shootout could endanger more lives than it hopes to save; we cannot afford to even consider this suggestion.
Students for Concealed Carry on Campus describes itself as a national, nonprofit group that supports concealed-handgun permits on university campuses. Formed after the Virginia Tech massacre, the group has no campus leader at the UI. Scott Lewis, the group's media coordinator, says the organization's goal is to take the "advantage away from dangerous individuals with no regard for the law." Arming campus police officers is a positive step forward, Lewis says, but still not enough. We, however, feel that it's the most logical response thus far.
The UI has not taken past instances of campus violence lightly. The Hawk Alert system, introduced last year, can contact students within minutes of a threat on campus. This, combined with the reassurance that university - as well as Iowa City - police are prepared for a rapid response, is far more comforting than potentially armed students. The fear of a faceless, lurking gunman is intensified when tragedies such as the Northern Illinois shooting occur. The response, however, must be a rational one. Armed students will not diminish those fears; in fact, that anxiety may be amplified. Putting more deadly weapons in peoples' hands will never be a sensible response to violence.











Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 38
Bacon
posted 2/22/08 @ 6:36 AM CST
And this editorial board could not be more wrong! How many on the editorial board have honestly ever fired or even held a gun? It is ignorance that drives your opinion, not experience. (Continued…)
S
posted 2/22/08 @ 7:09 AM CST
So then, the editorial board's position is that they, as students, go to class now trusting that because the school says "Don't bring guns to class," then obviously no one in class has guns and they are safe because the school has an unenforceable mandate in place. (Continued…)
Veritas
posted 2/22/08 @ 7:24 AM CST
How wrong you are. If you examine the statistics on concealed carry permit holders, you'll find that their crime rates are the lowest of any group of US citizens, including the police. (Continued…)
HW
posted 2/22/08 @ 7:37 AM CST
One of my ancestors was clergyman. He packed a cheap .32 cal. Iver Johnson pistol given to him by his family when left home to attend college over 100 years ago. (Continued…)
Tim
posted 2/22/08 @ 7:41 AM CST
Could those of you opposed to concealed carry please cite the studies and/or data that supports your pessimistic forecasts? Concealed carry has been legal for years and years now in the overwhelming majority of US states. (Continued…)
Adam
posted 2/22/08 @ 8:04 AM CST
The events that happened at Virginia Tech and NIU are heartbreaking, unfortunate and SO PREVENTABLE. It just too bad that those piece of garbage killers were allowed to take their own life, and not the steel from the gun of a citizen being allowed to exercise their 2nd ammendment rights. (Continued…)
Brian Bultema
posted 2/22/08 @ 9:05 AM CST
It seems the majority of people for increasing the amount of guns in society are longing for a sense of Old-West, vigilante justice that just rarely happens in today's world. (Continued…)
Nicholas
posted 2/22/08 @ 9:12 AM CST
This column just stinks of ignorance of what a CC permit even is. Not just anyone can get one. Do some research. The kind of person that has a permit is usually a "target" of some sort and requires some sort of protection (witnesses to crime, etc. (Continued…)
Factoid
posted 2/22/08 @ 9:26 AM CST
I believe the editorial board was behind arming campus security, which will have no impact on safety in the classrooms. Arming the students makes more sense. (Continued…)
Voice
posted 2/22/08 @ 9:52 AM CST
I challenge anyone on the editorial board to acquire a firearm and a concealed carry permit in Johnson county, and report on the process, whether they got adequate training, whether the background check was thorough enough, and whether they still feel that a person who makes it through this process is capable of the sort of "wild west shootouts" that they are insinuating. (Continued…)
Post a Comment